Proof of Verification
This page show specific test cases and provide user with the json file which can be loaded in the Analysis Tools 2.0 and the evaluation matrix pdf for checking. These are selected test cases of our tests proving the correctness of the implemented VDA 6.3 rules and calculations. The provide examples test only specific rules and calculations and are selective, additional checks were implemented and executed conducting various other checks.
At the top you will find the the VDA 6.3 report verification followed by the VDA 6.3 potential analysis.
VDA 6.3 Report
Test case 1:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
N.a. elements will not be part of the max value and excluded from the evaluation (12 of 13) so max value 120
calculated value 98 % and rating A
no downgrading additional expected
proper calculation of P2,P5
Expected ratings
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P2, P5 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 0 |
Â
Test case 2:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
calculated value 88 % and rating B
no downgrading additional expected sub rating also B
proper calculation of P2,P5
Expected ratings
Â
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P2, P5 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 0 |
Test case 3:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
calculated value 78 % and rating C
no downgrading additional expected sub rating also B
proper calculation of P2,P5
Expected ratings
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P2, P5 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 0 |
Test case 4:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
N.a. elements will not be part of the max value and excluded from the evaluation (12 of 13) so max value 120
calculated value 92 % and rating A
expected downgrading to C because of asterisk question 0
no product group E downgrading is n.a.
no process Eu downgrading
proper calculation of P2,P5
Expected ratings
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P2, P5 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 0 |
Test case 5:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
N.e. elements will not be part of the max value and excluded from the evaluation (12 of 13) so max value 180
calculated value 99 % and rating A
no downgrading
no product group E downgrading is n.a.
no process Eu downgrading
invalid result due to incomplete 2/3 rule application
in assessment → audit result additional line showing P4 as incomplete
process and product for process element is average on n.a. set value is used
correct marking of n.a. for P4 but marking it Epzr in red and also P4 due to activated elements require 2/3 (SI: EP4 is n.e.)
proper calculation of P2,P3,P4, P5
Â
Expected ratings
Â
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P2, P3, P4, P5 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | yes |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 0 |
Test case 6:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
calculated value 95% and rating A
Downgrading to B because of EP2 70%
proper calculation of P2,P3,P4,P5,P7
Expected ratings
Â
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P2, P3, P4, P5, P7 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 0 |
Test case 7:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
calculated value 94% and rating A
Downgrading to B because of question 0
proper calculation of P2,P3,P4,P5,P7
Expected ratings
Â
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P2, P3, P4, P5, P7 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 0 |
Test case 8:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
calculated value 97% and rating A
no downgrading
proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question
grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied
proper calculation of P6 and E and EU
Expected ratings
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P6 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 3 |
Test case 9:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
calculated value 93% and rating A
proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question
grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied
proper calculation of EU1
downgrading because of E1 below 77% B
proper calculation of P6 and E and EU
Expected ratings
Â
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P6 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 3 |
Test case 10:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
calculated value 90% and rating A
proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question
grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied
downgrading because of E1 65% C
proper calculation of P6 and E and EU
Expected ratings
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P6 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 3 |
Test case 11:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
calculated value 94% and rating A
proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question
grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied
downgrading because of EU1 68% C
proper calculation of P6 and E and EU
Expected ratings
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P6 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 3 |
Â
Test case 12:
Checks:
proper application of new 2/3 rule
P6.2 and others are not defined
P6 and E values are n.e.
Expected ratings
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P6 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 0 |
Process(es/steps) | 3 |
Test case 13:
Checks:
Only evaluate activated process elements
calculated value 94% and rating A
proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question
grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied
downgrading because of EU1 80% B for Total
Product 1 (Process 1,2)
calculated value 93% and rating A
downgrading because of EU1 80% B for Total
Product 2 (Process 3)
calculated value 93% and rating A
proper application of selected process to product group
proper display of product group grade in assessment->audit result table
proper calculation of P6 and E and EU in different product groups
Expected ratings
Â
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Process element | P6 |
P3 and P4 separated by process/product | no |
Product(group)s | 2 |
Process(es/steps) | 3 |
VDA 6.3 Potential Analysis
Â
Checks
proper application of green
downgrading to yellow on more than 6 yellow
downgrading to red on one red
downgrading to red on more than 12 yellow
downgrading to n.a. on more than three
Expected ratings
Â
Â