Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

This page show specific test cases and provide user with the json file which can be loaded in the Analysis Tools 2.0 and the evaluation matrix pdf for checking. These are selected test cases of our tests proving the correctness of the implemented VDA 6.3 rules and calculations. The provide examples test only specific rules and calculations and are selective, additional checks were implemented and executed conducting various other checks.

At the top you will find the the VDA 6.3 report verification followed by the VDA 6.3 potential analysis.

VDA 6.3 Report

Test case 1:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • N.a. elements will not be part of the max value and excluded from the evaluation (12 of 13) so max value 120

  • calculated value 98 % and rating A

  • no downgrading additional expected

  • proper calculation of P2,P5

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P2, P5

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

0

View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023.json
View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023.pdf

Test case 2:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • calculated value 88 % and rating B

  • no downgrading additional expected sub rating also B

  • proper calculation of P2,P5

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P2, P5

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

0

View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (3).json
View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (3).pdf

Test case 3:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • calculated value 78 % and rating C

  • no downgrading additional expected sub rating also B

  • proper calculation of P2,P5

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P2, P5

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

0

View file
nameReport_Verification2_06.Jan.2023.pdf
View file
nameReport_Verification2_06.Jan.2023.json

Test case 4:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • N.a. elements will not be part of the max value and excluded from the evaluation (12 of 13) so max value 120

  • calculated value 92 % and rating A

  • expected downgrading to C because of asterisk question 0

  • no product group E downgrading is n.a.

  • no process Eu downgrading

  • proper calculation of P2,P5

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P2, P5

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

0

View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (1).pdf
View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (1).json

Test case 5:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • N.a. elements will not be part of the max value and excluded from the evaluation (12 of 13) so max value 120180

  • calculated value 99 % and rating A

  • no downgrading

  • no product group E downgrading is n.a.

  • no process Eu downgrading

  • invalid result due to incomplete 2/3 rule application

  • in assessment → audit result additional line showing P4 as incomplete

  • process and product for process element is average on n.a. set value is used

  • correct marking of n.a. for P4 but marking it Epzr in red and also P4 due to activated elements require 2/3 (SI: EP4 is n.e.)

  • proper calculation of P2,P3,P4, P5

Expected ratings

Image RemovedImage RemovedImage RemovedImage AddedImage Added

Parameter

Value

Process element

P2, P3, P4, P5

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

yes

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

0

View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (2).json
View file
nameEM_Report_VerificatiVerification_0611.JanApr.2023 (21).pdf

Test case 6:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • calculated value 95% and rating A

  • Downgrading to B because of EP2 70%

  • proper calculation of P2,P3,P4,P5,P7

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P2, P3, P4, P5, P7

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

0

View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (4).pdf
View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (4).json

Test case 7:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • calculated value 94% and rating A

  • Downgrading to B because of question 0

  • proper calculation of P2,P3,P4,P5,P7

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P2, P3, P4, P5, P7

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

0

View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (6).json
View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (6).pdf

Test case 8:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • calculated value 97% and rating A

  • no downgrading

  • proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question

  • grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied

  • proper calculation of P6 and E and EU

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P6

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

3

View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (7).json
View file
nameReport_Verificati_06.Jan.2023 (7).pdf

Test case 9:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • calculated value 93% and rating A

  • proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question

  • grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied

  • proper calculation of EU1

  • downgrading because of E1 below 77% B

  • proper calculation of P6 and E and EU

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P6

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

3

View file
nameReport_Verification9_06.Jan.2023.pdf
View file
nameReport_Verification9_06.Jan.2023.json

Test case 10:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • calculated value 90% and rating A

  • proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question

  • grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied

  • downgrading because of E1 65% C

  • proper calculation of P6 and E and EU

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P6

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

3

View file
nameReport_Verification10_06.Jan.2023.pdf
View file
nameReport_Verification10_06.Jan.2023.json

Test case 11:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • calculated value 94% and rating A

  • proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question

  • grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied

  • downgrading because of EU1 68% C

  • proper calculation of P6 and E and EU

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P6

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

0

Process(es/steps)

3

View file
nameReport_Verification11_06.Jan.2023.pdf
View file
nameReport_Verification11_06.Jan.2023.json

Test case 12:

Checks:

  • Only evaluate activated process elements

  • calculated value 94% and rating A

  • proper calculation to two decimals precision for overall compliance and per each question

  • grading for E1 to E3 is available and applied

  • downgrading because of EU1 80% B for Total

  • Product 1 (Process 1,2)

    • calculated value 93% and rating A

    • downgrading because of EU1 80% B for Total

  • Product 2 (Process 3)

    • calculated value 93% and rating A

  • proper application of selected process to product group

  • proper display of product group grade in assessment->audit result table

  • proper calculation of P6 and E and EU in different product groups

Expected ratings

Parameter

Value

Process element

P6

P3 and P4 separated by process/product

no

Product(group)s

2

Process(es/steps)

3

View file
nameReport_Verification_08.Jan2023.pdf
View file
nameReport_Verification_08.Jan2023.json

VDA 6.3 Potential Analysis

Checks

  • proper application of green

  • downgrading to yellow on more than 6 yellow

  • downgrading to red on one red

  • downgrading to red on more than 12 yellow

  • downgrading to n.a. on more than three

Expected ratings

View file
namePot-Report_Verification-Potential_06.Jan.2023.pdf
View file
namePot-Report_Verification-Potential_06.Jan.2023.json